Iraq Backlash

The main argument in this article is that the keep battle of the coupled States in the war in Iraq will become to unforeseen and even disastrous consequences such as a elegant war or even global war given the accompaniment that the United States is ill equipped at dealing with the insurgents and in correctly identifying its role in the conflict and the impact of its continued involvement in the war.The writer presents his legal opinions by first defining what backlash is and proceeding to verbalise the escalating death toll and skirmishes that have happened in Iraq since the United States has gotten involved. The writer consequently paints a grim picture of future that lies ahead if the United States continues its policies and involvement in the conflicts in the Middle East and the war in Iraq.The view presented by the writer is correct to the extent that the continued involvement of the United States could indeed make them the victim of unforeseen and disastrous consequen ces such a rising casualties of the armed forces currently stationed there and of the civilians. The continued involvement in Iraq could also be detrimental to the United States economy as whatever conflict in the Middle East causes the price of oil to burn d consume and containly shams the economic output of any country.A prolonged war, as in this case, caused by continued United States involvement will definitely affect its economy in the long run. The writer however is too affectionate to point out that global war will be the direct effect of such actions. There is no substantial evidence to give tongue to that this will indeed result to a world war third or a world war IV. The other world leaders have been quick to show that the United States is acting on its own accord and have refused to lend any aid in the war in Iraq.