Framing Apologies in a Political and Diplomatic Context Essay -- criti

IntroductionThis test is an analysis of the 2005 penning, by Janna Thompson, Apology, justice and respect a critical refutal of policy-making apology. A theme presented at the Australian Association for skipper and Applied Ethics twelfth Annual Conference, Adelaide, September 2830. This paper can be found at http//www.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/gig/aapae05/documents/thompson.pdf.Summary This paper critically evaluates the importance of negotiations and expansive discourse in framing apologies, in particular in a political and diplomatic context. Focusing on 2 relevant Sino-American issues, viz. the 1999 bombing at the Belgrade Chinese embassy by US aircraft and the 2001 airplane collision between a Chinese supporter jet and an American spy plane, the author evaluates pragmatism in diplomatic apologies, with specific reference to the US apology to China during these two events. methodology and ObjectivesThis study was based on off-the-record interviews that were conducte d in late 2001 with four unnamed US State Department officials who were involved in public negotiations of the US apologies. The author writes that his aim in carrying out these interviews was threefold. Firstly, he wished to clarify the intricacies of world-wide diplomatic apologies. Secondly, he intended to probe the opinions of official diplomats on such apologies. Finally, he aimed that this study would contribute to a greater understanding of the characteristics of diplomatic apologies and the pragmatics involved therewith. ObservationsThrough this study, the author puts forth the fact that most political apologies are framed in such a way that twain the nations real political goals are achieved. For carrying out an act ... ...graphs 51, no. 3 227-242, accessed sniffy 10, 2011, http//www.sagepub.com/upm-data/13165_Chapter1.pdf.Gopen, George, and Judith Swan. The Science of Scientific Writing. American Scientist, November, 1990. Accessed August 10, 2011. https//www.ame ricanscientist.org/issues/issue.aspx?id=877&y=0&no=&content=true&page=4&css=print.Strongman, L. 2011. What on humankind? Understanding ambiguity toleration in business communication. PRism 8(1) 1-14, accessed August 10, 2011, http//www.prismjournal.org/fileadmin/8_1/Strongman.pdf.Thompson, Janna. 2005. Apology, justice and respect a critical defence of political apology. subject presented at the Australian Association for Professional and Applied Ethics 12th Annual Conference, Adelaide, September 2830. Accessed August 10, 2011. http//www.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/gig/aapae05/documents/thompson.pdf.