Female Political Candidacy :: Politics Political Science

Fe anthropoid semipolitical CandidacyAbstractFactors which influence female person political candidacy were investigated. The results indicated momentous gender differences on the following hypotheses H1 Female and male political leading leave behinding differ in their uses of interpersonal king H2 Female and male political leadership will identify different motivations in seeking public office and, H3 Female and male political leaders will differ in their perception of barriers to familiarity as political candidates. The subaltern perspective of race was also considered but was not found to be a significant barrier to female candidacy. This significantly predictive cast has regional and international implications, and future studies will tested it comparatively by state and region to affirm its generalizability.Female Political Candidacy A Racial and Gender PerspectiveThis study examines the use of interpersonal power by females in select political positions, the fact ors that influence women to run for elect office, and the barriers that hinder female candidacy. Drawing from three areas of gender difference - women and victimization (IWPR, 2000), institutionalization of power relationships (Parsons, 1969), and socialization of gender roles (Bennett and Bennett, 1999 Lindsey, 1997) - the research focuses on women in elected political leadership positions using a analogy of women and men matched by elected positions in the State of Mississippi, USA. The hypotheses were H1 Female and male political leaders will differ in their uses of interpersonal power H2 Female and male political leaders will identify different motivations in seeking public office and, H3 Female and male political leaders will differ in their perception of barriers to participation as political candidates. The secondary coil perspective of race is evaluated using statistical methods on a non-matched comparison of African Americans and Caucasians who responded to the gen der study. Economic arguments and incentives for policy supporting broad-based political way are numerous. There is widespread acceptance that peoples who rush little political voice are overlooked in the distribution of public goods and have less access to education and health. Kenworthy and Malami (1999) note that representative critical muckle necessary for females as a social group to exert a substantial influence on politics is considered to be 30% of a legislative body, while Harvard sociologist Rosabeth Moss Kantor puts representation at closer to 50% to attain a difference in the culture of an institution (Ivins, 2001). The United States position for International Development notes that while almost all peoples around the world, specifically women, have a legal right to vote, actual female participation is inhibited by cultural, social, economic, legal and educational constraints (USAID Fact Sheet, 1997).