Mary, Where are U :: essays research papers

The debate over whether or not the United States administration shouldgrant tuition vouchers to the parents of children who attend private informs hasgone on for many years, and has included many powerful arguments on bothsides of the issue. Those who actualize the private school vouchers believe thatthey are beneficial to everyone because they promote productivity in both publicand private schools alike, and they also give low-in grapple families the chance togive their children a choice private school education. Those in opposition to thevouchers say that they will drain money out of the public schools, and that theyonly truly help a miniature population, mainly the wealthy and advantaged. Opposers also believe that the vouchers interfere with the Separation of Churchand State, since many private schools take aim a religious affiliation. This issue hastruly been a controversial one, with many people fighting arduously. Afterreading through the various arguments for each side , one can not help but cometo their own conclusion about private school vouchers.There have been many school voucher programs proposed in the past,but they all seem to contribution one common theme. This similarity between them isthat they all promote giving households that send their children to private schoolsa tax dollar-funded voucher that would cover all or most of the cost of theschools tuition. Many of the proposals also include the right for parents to chosewhich private school their child will attend. The vouchers allows students to usethe money that would be subsidized for them in a public school to go toward aprivate school education. This system redirects the flow of educational funding,bringing it to the individual family instead of the school district.The stem of school vouchers first became popular after Milton Friedman,an economist, released two publications, in 1956 and in 1962, that supported thevoucher plan. In his 1962 book, Capitalism and Freedom, when Friedma ndiscusses education, he turns to public education criticizes it for beingness"unresponsive" because it has been free from competition (Lieberman, 120). Vouchers would provide this much needed competition, since public schoolswould now have to contend with the private schools that were receiving the samepayments they were. Friedman believes that,"most dissatisfied parents have only two options. They can enroll theirchildren in private schools, in which case they have to bear the costs inaddition to paying taxes to support public schools. Or they can resort topolitical action, an option Friedman regards as ineffective." (ibid.)After Friedman publicly showed his support for school vouchers, a debate began